Oct 07 2008

American Apparel, their ironic clothes and their porn photography!

Published by at 3:00 am under Jerks

After spending less than 3 minutes on the American Apparel website I am ready to go on a killing spree. I hate EVERYTHING about American Apparel!

Where do I even fucking start? Let’s start with their clothing. Sure, these guys make a good basic T-shirt but does anyone really need a shiny gold body suit? These assholes aren’t embarrassed to sell fanny packs and apparently ironic hipsters aren’t embarrassed to buy them. The fact that American Apparel can actually make hipster jerks buy fanny packs is pretty much all you need to know about how ridiculous American Apparel and hipsters are. I bet American Apparel could get hipsters to wear adult diapers. If I see diapers on their website I’m fucking suing.

The most obvious thing to hate about American Apparel is their cheap, snuff film style photography. I find it a little distracting when I’m staring at some dirty scumbag’s pubes or a girl who looks like she was just pulled into a van and will never see her family again. In fact, just now when I went to their website this is what I was greeted with (fair warning, nudity). I am not offended by nudity but I am offended by this obvious attempt to look edgy or cool or whatever the hell they think they are. Who wants to buy clothes from a company whose website looks like an underground, teenage prostitution catalog?

Their founder, Dov Charney, is a supreme douchebag who famously couldn’t help but masturbate several times in front of a female ‘Jane Magazine’ writer during an interview. This king of the turds also has countless sexual harassment lawsuits against him, what a shocker!

I have to go vomit into my fanny pack.

Be Sociable, Share!

6 comments so far

6 comments to “American Apparel, their ironic clothes and their porn photography!”

  1. Solomon808on 07 Oct 2008 at 2:24 pm

    Why isn’t This guy in jail. You can’t just go around pulling your pecker out and beatin off. And that chick from Jane followed him around for like a year or something. She liked it.

  2. MalaSuerteon 07 Oct 2008 at 8:54 pm

    seriously, she must have dug it. You can’t have a conversation with a guy while he’s punchin the munchkin.

  3. Bennon 07 Oct 2008 at 9:14 pm

    I am quite glad that you posted that there was nudity in that link. I am at work, and I think that would be inappropriate. Thank you for the heads-up.
    And as for American Apparel: they suck. They don’t really have good clothes. They’re made by children in China. Even if that weren’t true, I still wouldn’t buy from them. Especially not now, knowing how they take pictures for their website. I will not say that’s it’s degrading, because it’s not. They chose that work, and that’s their problem. But honestly? I do not have any respect for them because when I look at the pictures, I feel violated. I feel degraded myself.
    And sadly, they are a popular clothing brand. I feel terrible for anybody willing to spend their hard (or not so hard, like me) earned money on their clothes when I (the royal I) could just go to Kohl’s. I find Kohl’s to be both better and cheaper in price.

  4. You Just Made My List!on 07 Oct 2008 at 10:26 pm

    Mala, You are correct. I read that she thought it was interesting. Funny, when I masturbate in public in front of women they never seem to find it that interesting.

    Benn, Actually American Apparel is manufactured in Los Angeles under very good working conditions. That is the only good thing they have going for them. Other than that they suck.

  5. Perkinson 20 Jan 2010 at 8:31 pm

    I worked for a company about 9 years ago, screenprinting tees and stuuf, and we got an account from these guys. We went to a convention in Vegas and they had these more than likely underage girls walking around in g strings and see through tees with no bras passing out cards with panties attached to them. When we saw their catalogs we decided to quit using their shirts unless asked for them specifically by a client. The catalogs looked like cheap, local pornography. As you can see, they suck.

  6. Joeon 16 Nov 2011 at 1:01 pm

    Whoever came up with this ad is clearly a moron. I guess no one thought that this might be considered inappropriate..